Research Interest of Igor Bandos
Publication 1: Covariant action for the super-5-brane of M-theory, by I. Bandos, K. Lechner, A. Nurmagambetov, P. Pasti, D. Sorokin and M. Tonin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4332—4334 (1997) [hep-th/9701149]. (URL)
Publication 2: BPS states in M-theory and twistorial constituents, by Igor A. Bandos, José A. de Azcérraga, José M. Izquierdo and Jerzy Lukierski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4451-4454, 2001 [hep-th/0101113]. (URL)
Publication 3: SDiff Gauge Theory and the M2 Condensate, by I.A. Bandos and P.K. Townsend, JHEP 0902, 013 (2009), 35pp. [arXiv:0808.1583v2[hep-th]. (URL)
URL of Research:
Statement of Interest:
My main field of interest is String/M-theory, more
specifically: brane physics, supergravity and
supersymmetric field theories, superfield methods. Among
the results which we obtained with my collaborators, there
is the covariant and κ-symmetric action for the M-theory
super-5-brane [PRL’97=hep-th/9701149]. Searching for a
complete description of the M5-brane interaction with
D=11 background we constructed a new duality symmetric
version of D=11 supergravity, including both 3-form and
6-form gauge fields (NPB’98=hep-th/9711055; notice that
for many years it was assumed that such a formulation
does not exist at all).
In one of our recent papers with P.K. Townsend
(CQG’08=arXiv:0806.4777 [hep-th]) we used the light cone
gauge fixed M5-brane action of [PRL’97=hep-th/9701149] to
search for the origin of d=3 N=8 Bagger-Lambert-Gustavsson
(BLG) model in its Nambu bracket (NB) realization. This BLG
model attracted recently much attention as a possible
candidate for the low energy description of multiple
M2-brane systems; then NB BLG model invariant under
infinite dimensional SDiff3 (volume preserving
diffeomorphisms) symmetry describes a condensate of
M2-branes. The results of (CQG’08=arXiv:0806.4777) are
mainly negative in the sense that what we found starting
from M5-brane in flat superspace is an infinite tension
limit which reproduces the so-called Carrollian limit of
the NB BLG model, but not the complete BLG model. The case
of M5-brane in AdS4xS7 background is under study now. In
our second paper on this subject
(JHEP’09=arXiv:0808.1583v2[hep-th]) we put NB BLG model in
general context of SDiff gauge theories and also presented
its N=8 superfield formulations in the standard N=8
superspace (see also PLB’08= arXiv:0808.3568 [hep-th]) and
in the so-called the pure spinor superspace.
Among the tools which we had proposed and used continuously
in our study of supersymmetric branes there was
superembedding approach (NPB’95=hep-th/9501113, PLB’95=hep-
th/9502141), which was also recognized and applied by other
researches. In particular, P. Howe and E. Sezgin used the
superembedding approach to obtain equations of motion for
M5-brane and D=10 Dirichlet-branes several months before
the complete covariant actions for these objects were
constructed. In one of my recent papers arXiv:0812.2889
[hep-th] (to appear in JHEP’09) the superembedding approach
was applied to studying the possible existence of new
7-branes in type IIB theory (namely of the so-called
Q7-branes, which had been known as supergravity solutions
and then, some times ago, conjectured to be supersymmetric
dynamical objects described by a supersymmetric and kappa-
symmetric worldvolume action). This investigation suggested
possible application of superembedding approach to the old
standing problem of supersymmetric and Lorentz covariant
description of multiple Dp-brane systems, also known as a
search for supersymmetric non-Abelian DBI action; this is
presently under investigation.
Among other topics of my research interest there are the
problems of fundamental degrees of freedom of M-theory
(see PRL’2000=hep-th/0101113, PRD’04=hep-th/0312266),
of twistor approach and twistor string
(see JHEP’06=hep-th/0604037 and refs. therein),
of constructing selfconsistent interaction of higher spin
fields (see PRD’2000=hep-th/9907113, JHEP’04=hep-
th/0407180, JHEP’05=hep-th/0501113)
and the old-standing problem of the covariant superstring
quantization, presently in the form of searching for the
origin and meaning of the pure spinor formalism
(see PLB’07= arXiv:0707.2336, NPB’08= arXiv:0710.4342) and
for its possible generalizations.