\phantom{of the opera}
Mayonnaise 1988
V. Gates, Empty Kangaroo, M. Roachcock, and W.C. Gall**
Compartment of Physiques and Astrology
Universally of Marineland, Alleged kraP, MD
ABSTRACT
We derive a theory which, after spontaneous, dynamical, and ad hoc
symmetry breaking, and after elimination of all fields except a set of
zero measure, produces 10-dimensional superstring theory. Since the
latter is a theory of only everything, our theory describes much more
than everything, and includes also anything, something, and nothing.
(More text should go here. So sue me.)
Truth is funnier than fiction --- A no-name moose [1]
Publish or parish --- J.C. Polkinghorne
Gimme that old minimal supergravity.
Gimme that old minimal supergravity.
It was good enough for superstrings.
It's good enough for me. --------------- Christian
Physicist hymn [1½]
Corresponding to each new type of symmetry obtained with each new level of complexity, there is also a new level of masses. The last, obtained with superstrings, had been the Mass Planck (MPlanck) [6]. The corresponding new particles have short lifetimes, of the order of the Planck Time, which is much shorter than Daylight Savings Time or even Miller Time. (Mass Planck and Planck Time should not be confused with Planckmas, which is a time of year, celebrating the anniversary of the birth of the Universe.) These particles can be directly observed by experiment, but will have to wait for government funding of the planetary accelerator [7], which falls well within the category of Star Wars projects or SDI (the String Defense Initiative) [7 1/11]. With superpeas we now have a new level of masses: The first new particle predicted by this theory has a mass of the order of that of the universe. In fact, the theory that the universe is a quantum effect, created from the vacuum [8], is predicted by this theory, since the creation of a pea-antipea pair accounts for all the mass of the universe. The peas then immediately decay into hadrons, leptons, princetons, londons, wittons, yamrons, bartons, won-tons, neutrinos, winos, zuminos, and κ-cinos (the gauge field of κ-symmetry [8.ε]).
Many of the effects of superpea theory had already been anticipated from superstring theory: The spacetime discontinuum was predicted by pea-addicts [9] and the arbitrary dimensionality of its fundamental constituents was predicted by pea-brains [10]. (There was also long ago the theory of pea-forms [11], but any object has the form of a pea, to lowest approximation.)
There is, in fact, a simple proof that superpea theory is superior to superstring theory in describing physics: (1) Nothing is better than superstrings. (2) Superpeas are better than nothing. (3) Therefore, superpeas are better than superstrings.
First (as always), some notation: We use ♠ for left-handed modes, ♥ for right-handed modes, ♦ for modes with no hands so they hop around on their left foot, ♣ for modes which hop on their right foot [12], ♯ for modes with no hands or feet which just kind of slither any which way, and π álà modes. Handedness in enforced using Lagarage multi-pliers [13]. Of course, handedness only applies in the superstring approximation: To describe universe-mass states, we should also include North, South, East, and West modes [14].
We first consider compactification over Z2 R.B.folds [15], which has the interesting consequence that the low-energy hadronic spectrum can be obtained. In particular, pions are the Goldstone bosons of Z2:
eiπ = -1 . | (1½) |
Since this requires a breakdown of supersymmetry, it is necessary to determine the corresponding exhilarating field terms [16]. It is exactly this problem that has made supersymmetry a never-ending struggle for truth, beauty, and the eightfold way.
As a direct generalization we find the following equality for tortured tori:
New models with better experimental agreement can be obtained by replacing the lattices of toroidal compactification with the higher-dimensional generalizations of Penrose tilings. We refer to this as "Z̧g͡wc̈l̆œå." (This derives from the Gothic "ZGWCLOEA", meaning "that which should not be when (where, what, which, how) it might have been, although it will have been when(where, what, which, how)ever it was going to have had to be [17].") Z̧g͡wc̈l̆œåic theories have the interesting property that their zero-modes describe spontaneously broken gauge theories of affine Lie groups [18], or Catch-a-Movie algebras, whose central terms in the algebra are responsible for the symmetry breaking. Since higher dimensions also allow the creation of infinite numbers of universes, it is also possible to obtain natures with better theoretical agreement.
We use only modern methods of covariant quantization (BRSTU), since old-fashioned methods are inconsistent. (If it's not modern, it must be classical, which means it can't be quantum.) For finite orders of perturbation theory, the usual conformist field theory methods can be applied [19]. (According to the usual notation, the mechanics of the string is referred to as 2D field theory. Therefore, from now on we refer to the (classical/quantum) mechanics of the point particle as 1D field theory. Henceforth, we shall thus use the terms "classical mechanics" and "quantum mechanics" only when referring to physicists who are not qualified to do anything except work on cars.)
Since superpeas contain arbitrary dimensions, they easily allow nonperturbative calculations; for example, we have infinite-loop bubble graphs such as
This graph can be significantly simplified by the use of the twist and shout operators:
The manifest finiteness [20] of this result is obvious.
The kinetic terms of pea-field theory can be derived, as usual, from the first-quantized BRSTU operator. (The fact that the picture-hanging operator commutes with the BRSTU operator [21] almost certainly follows from the pretty-Schur lemma.) However, there is no third-quantization, since for superpeas, unlike string theory [4} and horseshoes [22], second-quantization is also last-quantization. Furthermore, there is no light-comb formalism, since peas are not cone-shaped, and such an approximation would produce comical singularities at the interaction point.
The conclusions are at the beginning.
We think people should acknowledge our work more often.
Others have recently tried to duplicate our results using superbeans [23]. We have not attempted to compare their results because we don't know beans.
Intelligent life has recently been discovered on Alpha Centauri. In fact, their civilization is much older than ours, and they have already discovered everything we know about particle physics centuries ago. In principle, we should thus rename all our physics theorems and equations after their original Centaurian discovers. Fortunately, this will essentially be unnecessary in practice, since all physicists on Alpha Centauri are named Witten.
We here give a derivation of eq. (5:30). We begin with the purely topological equation
0 = 0 . | (AA) |
Since this equation is gauge-invariant under (or over) the gauge transformations
δA = B , δB = C , δC = 5 , | (AAA) |
we can gauge-fix this equation to
A - B + C - 5 = 0 . | (AAAS) |
(We have used the notation 5=∫hereeternityd(cabin) (cabin)-1.) Then taking the limit 0→ħ, we find
W + it + 10 = ∫∫∫∏∑us(a) . | (ASPCA) |
To highest order in perturbation theory, this gives the final result
f = 0 , | (AMFM) |
for all rejective homeomorphic functionals f defined on self-conjugate paralattices [24] satisfying the Huntley-Brinkley equations [25], as implied by the invariances of the Ginrami differentials [26], and which are bounded on the unit square. Eq. (5:30) then follows as the special case f(f-1)=2.
A minor point was not understood by the referee, who has obviously not read our previous papers, so we will explain it here in more detail. Up to factors of 2 (which we ignore in our 2-free notation), superpea theory can be derived as the result of extending superstring theory to the conglomerate of all hypotheses, including pea-brains, pea-forms, pea-addicts, pea-souperspace, etc. It then obviously follows that all applications can be supersymmetrized with respect to the holonomy class of this deformation, and thus the injection of the resulting bijective mapping can be twisted subject to the economy-class constraints implied therof. Therefore, the added dimensions which are automatically canceled by the fermionic components, as enforced by the world-pea supersymmetry, contribute only to the added degrees of freedom which appear upon replacing the old modes with the new extended ones. These extra modes not only eliminate the singularity at both ends of the universe, but also cancel the divergences which are caused by the Big Bang due to the divergences of the paths of the galaxies. The submacroscopic effects then cointermingle with the supermicroscopic ones, and the temperature of the universe is fixed by the thermostatic behavior of the dilatatitaon field, except along the axis of the axion field. Then, ... what were we talking about? Oh, yeah, have you noticed how the print keeps getting smaller and smaller? This was also predicted by superpea theory. In fact, the missing mass problem in cosmology is no longer a problem, since most cosmologists have too much mass anyway. Furthermore, it has been proven that no referee reads more than the first 1,000 words of any paragraph anyway, so we might as well stop.
Superphysics is a highly technical area. Nobody understands any of the equations, so it is very important to understand all of the words. We have collected some of the more common terms here [27].